Support our troops [a]
It used to be that whenever you wanted to win an argument in political discourse, you just had to bring up Nazi Germany. It was the perfect catch-all; compare something to Naziism and it was instantly bad, even if you got the analogy and/or history wrong. So long reductio ad hitlerum, since 2003 the motivation for everything you see and read and hear is based on what is most supportive of our troops.
Sure, it's been an annoyance since day one. If you wanted to be patriotic and non-partisan, you just needed a 'Support Our Troops' emblem. It showed you didn't want Americans to die, but were too busy or stupid to deal with the issues that put them in harm's way.
Almost four years later, after the bumper stickers have faded and the slogans have become a kneejerk response to any discussion of politics at home and abroad, the ineffect of 'supporting our troops' has become lucid. The recent congressional discussions of a devastating and nonbinding resolution to reject the deployment of 20,000 more soldiers has shown that:
We support our tools (ignore the negative connotation). Tools used by an administration for - whatever goal our involvement in Iraq currently is. And tools used by politicians and car bumpers to distinguish themselves as patriots.
Sure, it's been an annoyance since day one. If you wanted to be patriotic and non-partisan, you just needed a 'Support Our Troops' emblem. It showed you didn't want Americans to die, but were too busy or stupid to deal with the issues that put them in harm's way.
Almost four years later, after the bumper stickers have faded and the slogans have become a kneejerk response to any discussion of politics at home and abroad, the ineffect of 'supporting our troops' has become lucid. The recent congressional discussions of a devastating and nonbinding resolution to reject the deployment of 20,000 more soldiers has shown that:
- Bringing our boys home will support the troops by removing them from the battlefield.
- Sending reinforcements will support the troops by increasing security in Iraq.
- Stale
- Without argumentative consequence
We support our tools (ignore the negative connotation). Tools used by an administration for - whatever goal our involvement in Iraq currently is. And tools used by politicians and car bumpers to distinguish themselves as patriots.
Labels: congress, debate, iraq, politics, support, troops, war
3 Comments:
"Support our troops" perhaps the slogan of political attrition? Packing politics so full of ambiguity that the result is civic disillusionment. Stalin had it right (sorry if you get fired for that) "One death is a tragedy, a thousand is a statistic". Everyone dramaticizes suffering to their own end. In this case they want the sand colored monopoly - Iraq, Iran, Afganistan
Afghanistan wishes it had sand.
I fail to see the main thesis of this diatribe. The logical flow is jumbled at best. Please strive for clarity for your next post. I look forward to reading it.
B-
Sincerely,
Prof. Howard Bloom
Post a Comment
<< Home